Bluetooth vs ANT+: Which Is Better for Cyclists?

In the world of cycling tech, data is power. Whether you’re training for a race or tracking your daily rides, understanding your performance metrics — like power, cadence, and heart rate — is essential. But when connecting your sensors to your bike computer or smartphone, there’s one question every cyclist faces: Bluetooth or ANT+?

Both are wireless communication protocols used in cycling devices, but they differ in range, connectivity, and compatibility. Let’s break down the Bluetooth vs ANT+ debate so you can decide which works best for your rides.

What Are Bluetooth and ANT+?

Before we compare, let’s define the two:

• Bluetooth: A universal wireless protocol found in most smartphones, tablets, and computers. It connects devices one-to-one (like your phone to your headphones).

• ANT+: A specialized wireless protocol created for sports and fitness devices. It’s used by Garmin, Wahoo, Favero, and other performance tech brands.

Both transmit real-time data from your sensors — such as power meters, heart rate straps, and speed sensors — to your display device. But they do it differently.

Key Differences Between Bluetooth and ANT+

Bluetooth: Simple and Universal

Bluetooth is built into nearly every modern device, making it incredibly easy to use.

Pros:

• Universal Compatibility: Works with smartphones and apps like Zwift, Strava, and TrainerRoad.

• Easy Setup: Just pair and go — no extra steps or dongles needed.

• Stable Connection: Reliable for single-device setups.

Cons:

• One-to-One Limitation: You can’t broadcast to multiple devices simultaneously.

  Example: If your power meter is connected to your phone, it can’t also connect to your bike computer at the same time.

• Slightly Shorter Range: Best for close proximity use, like indoor training.

Best for: Cyclists using smartphones or tablets for tracking rides or virtual training.

ANT+: The Cyclist’s Network Standard

ANT+ is the long-time favorite of serious cyclists and triathletes. It was designed specifically for sports data — and that shows in its flexibility.

Pros:

• Multi-Device Broadcasting: One sensor can transmit data to multiple devices simultaneously.

  Example: Your power meter can send data to your Garmin head unit and your indoor trainer at once.

• Longer Range & Stability: Ideal for outdoor riding and competition setups.

• Widespread Compatibility: Works seamlessly with most bike computers and head units.

Cons:

• Limited Smartphone Support: Most phones don’t have built-in ANT+; you may need a USB dongle or bridge.

• Slightly More Complex Setup: Pairing sometimes requires manual configuration on cycling computers.

Best for: Riders using Garmin or Wahoo bike computers who want multiple connections at once.

Bluetooth vs ANT+: Which Is Better for You?

Your ideal choice depends on your riding style and setup:

For most cyclists, dual-protocol devices (like the Favero Assioma power meters) offer the best of both worlds — supporting both Bluetooth and ANT+ connections. That means you can train indoors via Bluetooth and ride outdoors via ANT+ without switching gear.

Final Verdict

When it comes to Bluetooth vs ANT+, there’s no one-size-fits-all answer:

• Choose Bluetooth for simplicity, smartphone pairing, and indoor use.

• Choose ANT+ for reliability, data-sharing flexibility, and advanced cycling setups.

If your device supports both, you’ll always stay connected — no matter how or where you ride.