Cycling Dynamics Explained: Favero Assioma Metrics

When cyclists first start training with power, the goal is simple: ride harder, ride smarter, get fitter. But once you move beyond basic watts and FTP, pedal-based power meters like Favero Assioma unlock a deeper layer of data called Cycling Dynamics—and that’s where many riders get confused.
These metrics don’t tell you how strong you are. They tell you how you apply that strength. Used correctly, Cycling Dynamics can highlight inefficiencies, explain fatigue, and help refine technique. Used incorrectly, they can become a distraction. This guide explains what each metric actually means—and how to use it without overthinking your training.

What Cycling Dynamics Really Are (and What They’re Not)

Cycling Dynamics describe how force is applied throughout the pedal stroke. Instead of focusing on output alone, they show timing, balance, and distribution of power between legs and across the rotation.
They are not meant to replace power, cadence, or heart rate. Think of them as a diagnostic layer—useful for understanding why your power looks the way it does, especially during long rides, climbs, or fatigue.

Left/Right Power Balance: Context Matters More Than Symmetry

Left/right balance shows how much power each leg contributes. Many riders are surprised when they don’t see a perfect 50/50 split—but that’s completely normal. Even elite cyclists often sit at 48/52 or 49/51.
What matters isn’t a single number. What matters is trend. If your balance shifts significantly late in long rides, during hard climbs, or after an injury, that information is useful. If it stays consistent, there’s usually nothing to fix.
Trying to “train” balance directly rarely works. It’s best used as an observation tool, not a performance target.

Power Phase: Where Your Pedal Stroke Comes Alive

Power Phase shows the portion of the pedal stroke where you’re actually producing force. A longer power phase usually indicates smoother, more sustained force application, while a shorter phase often reflects punchier, more explosive riding.
Endurance riders tend to show longer power phases, especially at steady cadence. Sprinters and short-interval specialists often have shorter but more intense phases. Neither is inherently better—it depends on the riding context.
What’s most useful is watching how your power phase changes when you stand, climb, increase cadence, or fatigue. Sudden narrowing late in a ride often signals efficiency loss before you consciously feel it.

Power Phase Peak: A Window Into Timing and Fatigue

Power Phase Peak identifies where your maximum force occurs during the stroke. Early peaks usually indicate strong downstroke engagement. Later peaks can appear as fatigue sets in or cadence drops.
This isn’t a number you should try to “correct.” Instead, it’s a subtle indicator. If you notice your peak drifting significantly during long efforts, it may suggest pacing issues, gearing choices, or accumulating fatigue.
Coaches often look at this metric over time rather than ride-to-ride.

Pedal Smoothness: Often Misunderstood

Pedal Smoothness measures how evenly power is applied throughout the stroke. Many riders assume higher smoothness is better—but that’s not always true.
High smoothness often appears during low-intensity endurance riding. During sprints or hard accelerations, smoothness usually drops, even for world-class riders. That’s because peak force—not even distribution—is what produces speed in those moments.
Smoothness is best used during steady riding or technique-focused sessions. It’s not a metric to chase in races or intervals.

What Cycling Dynamics Reveal About Fatigue

One of the most practical uses of Cycling Dynamics is fatigue detection. As rides get longer, subtle changes often appear before heart rate or perceived exertion spikes.
You may see power phase shorten, balance drift toward one leg, or peak force shift later in the stroke. These patterns can help you decide when to adjust pacing, cadence, or fueling—especially in long endurance events.
This is where Cycling Dynamics quietly shine: they explain why effort suddenly feels harder.

Indoor vs Outdoor Differences Are Normal

Many riders notice different Cycling Dynamics indoors. Fixed trainer positions, higher sustained torque, reduced bike movement, and cooling differences all affect pedaling mechanics.
Indoor data isn’t wrong—it’s just context-specific. Compare indoor rides to indoor rides, and outdoor rides to outdoor rides, rather than mixing the two.

Why Favero Assioma Measures These Metrics Reliably

Favero Assioma uses Instant Angular Velocity (IAV)–based measurement directly at the pedals. Because force is measured independently on each side, left/right data and timing metrics are true measurements, not estimates.
This pedal-based approach is especially reliable for riders using oval chainrings, high cadence changes, or variable riding styles.

The Biggest Mistake Riders Make With Cycling Dynamics

The most common mistake is treating Cycling Dynamics as goals rather than insights.
Trying to force symmetry, chasing smoothness numbers, or comparing sprint metrics to endurance rides usually leads to frustration. These metrics are most valuable when observed over time and used to explain performance—not to dictate it.

Who Should Pay the Most Attention to Cycling Dynamics

Cycling Dynamics are most useful for experienced riders, endurance athletes, time-crunched cyclists seeking efficiency, and anyone returning from injury. Beginners will see far more benefit focusing on consistent power, cadence, and structured training first.

Conclusion

Cycling Dynamics turn Favero Assioma from a simple power meter into a powerful pedaling analysis tool. Metrics like power phase, balance, and smoothness don’t replace watts—but they explain the story behind them.
Used with restraint and context, they help you understand fatigue, efficiency, and technique without overcomplicating your training. Focus on power first. Use Cycling Dynamics to refine—not distract.

Shop the products from here.